18 November 2006

Justice and Mercy

Justice and mercy must be held in a delicate balance.

Emphasis on mercy to the exclusion of justice is ultimately indistinguishable from enabling.

Emphasis on justice to the exclusion of mercy is ultimately indistinguishable from abusiveness.

They do not begin there - but taken alone, either one followed as a sovereign good without any tempering from the other, they cannot do otherwise than end there.

Alcoholism, Denial, Enabling, and Healing

More than a decade ago, I became very close to a man who first entranced me, then baffled me utterly, then abused me savagely, and then - finally - much, much too late - drove me away.

This sounds like a capsule description of a relationship with a narcissist; but he was not a narcissist.

He took massive quantities of a benzodiazepine, but he did not have an anxiety disorder.

He had mood swings that surpassed anything I had ever seen before, but he was not bipolar.

He created more double binds, indulged in more 'gaslighting' crazymaking, evaded more responsibility, and cast more shame and blame than anyone I had ever known, but he did not have a personality disorder.

He was an absolute genius in his ability to elicit information from me that told him exactly how to hurt me, terribly, and he was absolutely heartless not only in his willingness to use that information to hurt me, but in his obvious pleasure in my pain. But he was not a sociopath.

He was an actively drinking alcoholic, in full denial of his alcoholism.

The closer I came to seeing this, the more I refused to enable it, the fiercer his enmity towards me became.

Alcoholism is everywhere. It can accompany narcissism, depression, bipolar disorder, antisocial personality disorder, avoidant personality disorder... and when it does, it adds its own baffling twists to the mix, and often intensifies the core problem significantly.

Alcoholism is everywhere. It doesn't just nod off behind the trash cans on Skid Row... it flies fighter jets and commercial airliners. It fights fires, sells real estate, performs open heart surgery, sets up phony shell corporations to gouge consumers, fiddles with the books and does phony audits, takes golden parachutes and bankrupts Fortune 500 companies. It preaches and teaches. It batters wives, husbands, and children. It cheats on spouses and cheats again on mistresses and paramours. It wraps cars around trees, kills grandmothers and high school students in head-on collisions, and walks away whistling without a scratch.

Some of my early companions in the 'adult world' of work were self-confessed, actively drinking alcoholics. The organizations that employed us seemed to prefer a certain... spinelessness... in middle management. The corporate culture seemed to be filled with blaming, shaming, scapegoating, evasion of responsibility, dishonesty, and denial of obvious problems; high-functioning active alcoholics would have been perfect perpetuators of such a system. In fact, people who behaved maturely, admitted and sought to fix mistakes, took responsibility and expected others to do likewise - in other words, sober, non-codependent adults - were manifestly unwelcome in these organizations, and were generally driven out or exploited until they left in disgust. But at first, these people were wooed, charmed, and conned. Entranced, then baffled, then abused, then finally driven away.

Much as I was wooed, charmed, conned, and harmed by the alcoholic I so loved, until I finally fled.

There is a pattern here; one I had not clearly seen before. And the pattern continues: for I find myself now contemplating people I have known in other times and places, who first entranced me, then baffled me utterly, then abused me savagely, and then - finally - much, much too late - drove me away.

One clear and obvious characteristic of my former beloved, and my former co-workers, and of other souls I've been wondering about recently, is that they seem to me to be 'stalled'. Life experiences produce no growth or change. Occasionally something that looks like progress occurs, but soon the temptation to stir the pot, abuse someone in pain, or muddy the waters on someone who is trying to figure something out presents itself, and they're right back in business at the same old stand.

That man who once meant so much to me was stalled in exactly this way. And he had several friends who were also unaccountably stalled. And he, and all his friends, turned out to be active alcoholics, drinking while in therapy, drinking while on their medications [if they ever actually took the medications], and laughing behind their hands at their employers, therapists, and 'loved ones'; because they thought they were fooling everyone, and that anyone they could fool so easily.... deserved anything that was done to them.

Thinking about that man, about his friends, I suddenly realized how often other people who baffle me - have made references to alcohol, after a particularly egregious bit of acting out. How often a few drinks too many was held up as an excuse.

I have been wondering how often I fail to see the forest for the trees, and how often other children of narcissists and parents with PDs may do the same.

People who are, and want to be, psychologically literate - want to understand our own inner workings and those of other people.

Yet some situations and people may mystify us for years. How often have we encountered someone
who is
abusive,
manipulative,
mercurial,
always has a 'story' and changes it every five minutes,
avoids responsibility as though it were anthrax,
disappears when confronted directly,
alternates between solid commonsense and empathy on one hand,
and wild defiant hostility on the other,
with no apparent 'trigger' - or 'triggers' that make no sense at all upon examination?

How often have we wondered if such a person suffers from a personality disorder??

... and how often has it been nothing more or less than active alcoholism at work, playing off our own enabling and denial?

Here is a refreshingly concise summary of what an alcoholic in genuine recovery looks like - from the U.S. Naval Flight Surgeon's Manual, via the website of the Third Marine Expeditionary Force.
"Most successfully recovering alcoholics consider themselves in no way different from other people except that they no longer drink alcohol. Some of the qualities which are indicative of the patient with a good working program of recovery are the following:

1. He no longer drinks alcohol or takes mind-altering drugs of any kind unless they are prescribed for an emergency or an elective surgical procedure.

2. He comfortably accepts the fact that he has alcoholism. He no longer wonders whether the cause is biochemical, genetic, or unknown, and he no longer hopes that someone will invent a magic pill so that he can drink again socially.

3. He is no longer concerned with his personal anonymity, as a matter of fact, he makes sure that his commanding officer is fully aware that he is an alcoholic.

4. He is actively involved in helping other alcoholics find sobriety, and he regularly attends Alcoholics Anonymous meetings. If he is in family therapy or group psychotherapy, this is an adjunct to Alcoholics Anonymous.

5. His sense of humor has returned, and he can now accept criticism when he is wrong."
I would venture to propose that the single most obvious giveaway that someone who baffles us may be an active, nonrecovering alcoholic is buried right there in item 5. The sense of humor, and the sense of responsibility. All of the nonrecovering alcoholics I've known were great jokers... but the jokes were nearly always mean, made at someone else's expense, or very childish in other respects - bathroom humor, sex-is-dirty-tee-hee, or racial/ethnic slurs.  Actual wit? Genuine irony? Nonexistent. Those things require perspective and detachment.

As for responsibility... with an active alcoholic? Fugeddaboutit. Not gonna happen. Not without a serious price tag. You may get an active, unrecovering alcoholic to make and keep a promise to you, but if they do, you'll pay for it. Help you move? Sure, and they'll break one of your prized possessions, too. House sit for you while you holiday? Absolutely. Sorry your pet got out and was run over... Take you to the doctor's office for your colonoscopy? Yes of course, and we'll fabricate some excuse to use your car, and we'll make sure we manage to dent it somehow.

It's a lot like narcissism, isn't it? But unlike narcissism, alcoholism can be overcome, and when an alcoholic is in serious recovery, they're totally different people. Often truly wonderful people. Often the most honest, committed, reliable, giving, generous people you will ever know. Not to mention fun to be with... because the humor is based in gratitude and awareness, and they haven't forgotten what they used to do, but they know where it came from and have made their amends... and they don't ever want to cause anyone pain like that again. Including themselves... because deep down, under the mean jokes and the mockery, under the abusiveness and the cruelty, there always was a human being in pain.

Once you realize this may be what you're dealing with -

then you realize that enabling doesn't work, and denial doesn't work, and controlling doesn't work, and in fact that anything you do in reaction is only fodder for games, until the person who is playing them can see and face their pain, and decides to stop.

Once you have gotten past the maladaptive parentally and societally instilled injunctions not to see these things, not to recognize them, not to call them what they are, not to react constructively and self-preservingly when you identify them -

then you can release the person and the interaction, free youself from the emotional entanglement and the need to 'make them see' or to 'win' - and be able to believe that there is hope for them.

You can believe that they, and you, may each find peace.

Strange Kindness and the Nedlog Rule

Many people who have been raised by abusive or addicted parents are "kind" to everyone and anyone but themselves, to a degree that is almost surreal.

Typically, these individuals have been raised by an enabler in partnership with an abuser. The abuser generally consumes most of the enabler's time and resources, so the children, neglected, learn early to be "kind".

Being considerate, placing others first, allows the child to avoid making demands on the enabler, and this is approved.

Being thoughtful, extending consideration to others, also allows the child to invest himself or herself in assisting the enabler to tend to the abuser, and this is also approved.

Unfortunately, the kindness such children learn is tainted. They are being groomed to become the next generation of enablers, and their "kindness" is pathologized. It will not attract kindness in return; it will, however, attract abusers in search of enabling.

When these children are grown, they will be expected to carry not only their own responsibilities, but also those of every abuser who has established a dependency on them - whether spouse, child, parent, friend, colleague, or supervisor.

They will rarely if ever be able to expect that those to whom they are kind will be kind to them in return. When the well runs dry, when they are ill, exhausted, or severely depressed, they will not be treated with compassion, but rage. They may then begin to realize that they are not, never were, and never will be regarded as human beings, but only as commodities, sources of support and energy, by those who abuse them.

When this double standard is finally perceived, the trapped enabler may begin to see that it is not only possible, not only legitimate, but absolutely essential to be kind to oneself, and to expect kindness to be reciprocated.

This is the Nedlog Rule: Do unto yourself just as kindly as you do unto others. You do not abuse others for profit or for pleasure; neither should others abuse you.

Ricochet Transactions: I'm Talking to You, But The Message is For Him (or Her)!

Like the term 'countersuggestibility', I've recently discovered that the term 'ricochet transaction' is almost impossible to find on the Web in its original meaning.

This term originally comes from the psychiatrist Eric Berne, who wrote the book Games People Play. As he used it, it means exactly what it seems to: someone says or does something to or with X, but the actual message in the words or action are intended to affect Y - who seems to be a bystander, but is really much more important in the communication than X is.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The art of the Ricochet Transaction is learned very young.

Consider a mother who has a newborn and a toddler, and is exhausted; the toddler has been acting up - refusing to eat her veggies, fighting about what clothes to wear - and mom is ticked at her. There's nothing overtly bad enough to hang a punishment on, because one thing was allowed to slide, then another, until a load of resentment accumulated. Mom can't just impose a time out now, and she knows it, but she's still ticked at this kid, and for whatever reason, she's unable to set her resentment aside and accept that toddlers are toddlers, and some days are better than others.

One very crude and very effective way to show the kid they're in the doghouse is through a Ricochet Transaction.

For instance, Mom starts pouring positive attention onto the newborn. Way more than her normal mode of interacting. Lots of smiles and bright happy squealing and bouncy-bouncy-baby, and of course the baby loves it; that's what babies are for, to love being loved.

Only this isn't really about loving the baby. It's about giving special attention to the baby, and withholding it from the toddler, as a form of emotional punishment for the toddler, because Mom is ticked. 

Babies can't distinguish between being loved because they're loved, and being treated lovingly because Mom's ticked at Big Sister and wants to rub her nose in her disfavored status by gushing over the baby.

Unfortunately, toddlers can. All the toddler has to do is notice that there's something good going on. She'll sidle up to Mom to see if she can get some attention and cuddles, too...

If Mom's on the up and up, and not playing a game, she'll quickly move to include Sister - teach her to play patty cake with the baby, praise her for being a big girl, show her how to play peekaboo with the baby, sing a lullaby together. She will include the sibling in the interaction, because this builds bonds and affirms the family as a family; she has more than enough love for both of her children and wants them to learn to love one another.

If Mom's not on the level, though, she'll do exactly the opposite. She'll freeze the kid out, possibly by simply ignoring her, possibly by physically picking up the baby and moving away from the toddler while continuing the interaction with the infant, possibly by using the toddler's attention-seeking as the pretext to deliver the punishment she wanted to deliver ["stop being such a pest!" followed by a slap on the hand and banishment to the crib... where the toddler can hear the attention continue to be lavished on the baby, as she cries in her room alone.]

The 'beauty' of this system is that Mom comes off looking like the good guy. The toddler is going to remember this, but she will learn to resent the baby, not her mother.

The horror of this system is that Mom is destroying her children's relationships with one another in the very cradle; setting them up to interact as competitors and to be used as weapons against one another.

Even otherwise sensible adults can miss seeing what's really going on. Mom can get all her girlfriends in on the game and multiply the shaming and rejecting of that toddler many times over.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What will this toddler do, when she goes off to elementary school, to middle school, to high school? She'll apply what she's learned to her little friends!

If she's on the outs with Susie, she'll be highly adept at making a big fuss over Sandy's new shoes, while Susie's new dress is totally ignored - or, if Susie's foolish enough to press the issue, the poor kid will be told her dress is ugly, or stupid. It isn't, of course, but in ricochet world, truth is a liability.

When our former toddler gets even older, she'll be even more sophisticated. She'll have seen more tricks from Mom's repertoire by now - the 'nice on the telephone, but screaming at me' trick; the 'talk nastily about me to Aunt Sarah while I'm standing right there being wounded by every word' trick; and the 'compliment Baby on her beautiful blond hair and say how glad you are that Baby's not a brunette, when I'm a brunette and I'm standing right there' trick.

And she'll apply them without thinking, because they're the only way she's been taught to communicate her displeasure with someone.

She's never been shown an honest confrontation, where both parties keep their defensive reactions in check in order to hear and understand what the other person is saying and why it matters.

Her mom has never said to her: "I love you, but I don't love the way you are behaving right now. If this behavior continues you're getting a time out." She learns of displeasure and disapproval by hearing them expressed about her to others, but never honestly or directly to her. She learns of her unfavored status by watching others get treated with pleasure and approval while she receives coldness and rejection.

She will know that she is disliked, but she will never really know why, and she will never know what to do about it, since anytime she approaches her mother and asks if something is wrong, she'll be told that nothing is wrong and to stop making a fuss.

And emotional abuse is passed on to the next generation, and one day in the future, she may banish her own toddler to her crib to cry alone...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The example above focuses on parent child and peer interactions among females - but men are very good at doing this to women, women are very good at doing this to men, and it is widespread in the workplace as well.

One male version involves talking very sympathetically about a woman who is absent, to the woman who is present, in order to 'flaunt the goodies' in the present woman's face: 'see what a nice guy I am to her? Isn't it a shame that you just don't rate this kind of treatment from me?'

One female version involves talking admiringly of the man who is absent, to the man who is present, for exactly the same purpose.

The office version, which is gender-neutral, usually involves working Serf X to the bone and never uttering a word of thanks, while making sure that Serf X hears Serf Y being praised and rewarded lavishly, often for things that Serf X has done.

We learn it young. So young, it's almost impossible to see it when it's happening to us, and even more impossible to see it when it's happening to someone else. But it's there, and we know it, because we can feel it.

If we see it, we can stop it - at least, in our own actions. And if we learn to recognize it when it is being done to us, we can learn to reduce its emotional impact...